罗技1600dpi怎么变慢了

so a while ago i made a video showing that the click latency difference between wired and wireless gaming mice was basically nothing to consider there was no correlation showing that wireless gaming mice was slower than wired as some people still believe today and really more than anything it's the debalance delay of the mouse that has the biggest impact on click latency more than anything so for those that we're currently using or considering upgrading to a wireless gaming mouse this was basically proof that wireless technology wasn't going to hold you back， but there's one thing missing from that testing and it's when it comes to the sensor and with a lot of gaming mice becoming wireless and a lot of new brands coming to the market you have to wonder if all sensors and firmware are made equally are all modern sensors actually the same are they all good enough and what does that mean when it comes to sensor late well to start entering at least a few of these questions i built this it's a built driven machine which can independently control a gaming mouse and at the same time trigger nvidia's ld software so that we can measure mouse sensor latency so let's take it through a bit of a test run today with some different gaming weights and some different settings without spoiling anything yeah there are some very interesting results so， of course before we actually go ahead and test anything and compare different gaming mice and different settings we need to first see if this thing actually works in the first place and well， yes， it actually works really well， admittedly a lot better than i expected so he's the same gaming mouse the logitech g pro supal i taken through the same test five different times and between each test it was removed and then reinstalled back into the test rig and the results here are incredibly closed what's even cooler to see is the incredibly small standard deviation for each individual test run illustrated by the original line here， which is about 1.4 milliseconds for each test here over 50 samples all right， so the test rig works everything is good to go and the first thing that i wanted to test here was whether or not higher dpi would result in lower sensor latency dpi is essentially the set resolution of the sensor the amount of dots per inch that the sensor is reading so we'd assume that with higher dpi and more samples that information can be read sooner and that results in lower latency yeah， that's pretty much exactly what we see not only does censulate and see decrease as we increase mouse dpi， but the standard deviation also shrinks a noticeable amount as well with the mouse are set to just 100 dpi， we're getting mouse movement registering on the screen at 25.7 milliseconds on average， but with some readings above 30 milliseconds now i don't know anyone who plays on 100 dpi most people play on either 400 or 800 and there there's about a two to two point five millisecond difference in central legancy， the latency benefits then trail off the higher that you raise dpi 1600 gives us a further 1.7 millisecond improvement over 800 dpi， but 3200 dpi only gives us about a half millisecond improvement on average so while it's pretty cool for me to measure and be able to show you these differences it's not enough for me to convince you to bump up your mouse dpi， however， another factor at play here is the actual movement speed of the mouse the results that you've seen so far have been with the mouse moving at a pretty typical movement speed if you play on a low or moderate sensitivity or from another perspective if you're flicking to an angle or different target in game but what about if you're moving your mouse less for example using only wrist movement to track an enemy at a moderate or long distance with less mouse movement there's less information for the mouse sensor to collect and so potentially higher dpi might be more useful here luckily we can test this just by simply changing the speed of the motor and just as we expected the differences in the results do grow with the higher dpi setting showing more beneficial for reducing latency when you have slower mouse movement now again obviously no one is gonna play on a hundred dpi but it's pretty crazy to see the insane sense of latency that this results in over 50 milliseconds from end to end interestingly though the dpi settings that players are using 480 and 1600 there is a measurable decrease in sensor latency about six milliseconds going from 400 to 800 dpi and then a further 3 milliseconds by bumping up to 1600 so what we can conclude from this testing is that if you play on a higher sensitivity it's more beneficial for you to get that higher sensitivity from your dpi as opposed to just cranking up the sensitivity multiplier in game for example， if you play on 400 dpi at 1.0 cents invalorant you'd be better off playing at 0.5 at 800 dpi or maybe 0.25 at 1600 dpi effectively the feel and sensitivity will be identical， but you'll have lower sensor lag and higher sensor resolution at those higher dpi settings and i think even for low to moderate sensitivity players this can still be beneficial when it comes to micro adjustments tracking and anything that involves fine mouse control the next thing that i wanted to test was whether plugging in the g pro super light would somehow improve or change the latency result just out of curiosity and nope the result is pretty much exactly the same nothing really worth noting or wasting time on here next up though let's compare a bunch of different wireless gaming mice different sensors different firmware different battery lifes and battery saving techniques but the sensor latency difference between them is surprisingly similar at most there's a 3.5 millisecond latency difference between the g pro superlat and the pernage ultra custom honestly i was expecting some bigger differences to talk about here but it looks like they're all within pretty much the same range but lastly what about wired gaming mice here there's no need to consider any battery saving techniques or sleep modes you can just continuously sample the center at full capacity at one thousand hurts polling rate， but does that actually make a difference well， actually kind of i'll highlight the wired gaming mice here for reference in white and yeah they do trend towards the top of the stack when it comes to sensor lag granted it's only by two to three north seconds on average and again we are measuring the entire latency chain here which includes the pc and the display， but it's still really really interesting to see the only wide mouse that sits towards the bottom here is the final mouse ultra light 2 and that's because that mouse has a max polling rate of 500 hurts whereas the other mice is set to 1000 hurts so yes， i'm pretty interesting results for sure that in the end the difference here from top to bottom is only 5 milliseconds that's not a perceivable difference or one that will help you win most gunfights， but it does highlight that there are measurable differences here for whatever reason that is still though when we're compare wired and wireless here for a mere 2 millisecond increase in sensor lag in return for a completely wireless tether free connection that's a trade off that most people should make especially if you play on a lower sensitivity wireless is significantly more comfortable to play with than slapping around a cable on your desk you'll probably make better plays in return and your accuracy will probably be a little bit better as well than any two miles second latency reduction can give you at the very least i'm really glad that i built this tool at least to validate new models or brands of gaming mice on the market especially the wireless gaming mice era that we're all trending towards no doubt we will see some different wireless implementations and sensor sampling techniques in the future and you can bet more gaming mice will be put to the test the next step for the tool will be to evolve it to test things like mass acceleration， sensor， accuracy， crew， tracking and things like that i will need to 3d print some more upgrades and write some new testing， which will take a couple weeks but i'm really excited to push that testing further and further and don't worry mouse reviews will still focus heavily on shape and build quality and all of that important stuff as well， but i think that you know sensor latency and quick latency tests are really important too moving forward until then a huge thanks for watching and i'll see you all in the next one。

看到评论区有小伙伴不会调节 dpi， 今天来给大家讲一下。首先安装一下逻辑驱动 gap， 不会的可以看上期视频安装号之后打开就是这个样子。我们单击这个鼠标，进入调节界面，这个画面是调节鼠标 dpi 和回报率的， 我的鼠标目前是一千六百 dpi， 看下面横线， dpi 越低，鼠标精度越高，所以鼠标移动越慢， 反之 dpi 越高，鼠标移动越快。你还可以在 dpi 线上任意位置添加新的 dpi 数值，任意移动。 下面这个是鼠标回报率，以前的回报率就是直 鼠标一毫秒给电脑报告一次位置，一百二十五回报率就是鼠标八毫秒给电脑报告一次位置。很多 fps 职业歌回报率都是设置一千数值， 这个是给鼠标其余按键赋予相应的功能。还有大名鼎鼎的鼠标红，这个我就不讲了，感兴趣的小伙伴可以上网搜索如何成为红孩儿。最后一个是灯光设置， 这里有呼吸灯和固定两种设置，呼吸灯还可以调节呼吸频率，右边图像显示调节结果，固定灯可以调节颜色。好了，逻辑驱动基本讲完了，还有别的疑惑的小伙伴可以在评论区留言哦。

为什么逻辑鼠标每次开机 dpi 都很低？打开驱动才正常，修改版载数据就能解决。打开计划拨，选择你的鼠标，然后像小森一样删掉所有不用的 dpi， 佛系也是这样设置的，这样你就只有一个， 一直会是这样是吧？对对，不会动。然后回到首页，点齿轮进入设置，点关闭，再把放入一改为桌面默认，这样你的 dpi 就存到鼠标里了，换电脑也不会动。

哎，芳芳，每次我开机之后都得重新启动接哈我驱动，这也太麻烦了，咋办呢？那是你们不会用， 我来告诉你怎么用啊。首先这个鼠标啊，是咱们职业哥用的一款鼠标 only， 这个鼠标他是支持这个自定义，省的别搁这墨迹了，赶紧讲个正题吧，懂？ 首先我们打开逻辑的 gcip 软件，找到左上角三个横杠游戏应程序，我们新建一个配置方案，幺三二点进去，然后找到我们的鼠标， 把没用的地片都向上拖拽掉，然后找到右上角小齿轮，点一下关闭， 找到配置文件，替换到我们的幺三二就可以了。注意这里不要顶起用，要给它擦掉。 设置为搬载模式以后就可以脱离遮瑕法驱动软件使用了。小样。

鼠标休眠之后再用，这 dpi 怎么变低了呀？那你别让他休眠不就得了，你看这大灯不休眠多费电呢。那你就打开驱动，选择末日模式，回标率改一改，简单设置一下你用的 dpi， 然后这个小齿轮启动版本模式， 然后这个选择一下刚才你默认的方案，这样的话你怎么休眠 dpi 数值也不会变了，并且你换一百套电脑也这样。

为什么每次重启我鼠标 dpi 都这么低啊？还有这反感模式应该怎么设置啊？ 下班我来告诉你如何使用 jheham 的清远键，以及如何启动打板模式。首先我们打开逻辑的 jham 清远键，找到鼠标， 将您没用的地派树枝都脱掉掉，留下几个您所习惯的就可以了。第二选项，调整您的侧键主键的功能设置，一般我们将侧键的 dpi 循环放在这个位置， 您在骑完皮卡时候就不需要反目标了。下面这个是灯光区啊，您可以设置一些你所有喜欢的这个灯光效果都受潮以后点一下斑的那次启动。

如果你买的大几百的无线鼠标有延迟，那可能不是无线鼠标的问题，可能是你游戏 dpi 设置的问题。有一位外网博主测试发现 dpi 设置越高，延迟就越低。那我自己也是去靶场测试了一下，八百到一千多 dpi 的情况下一切正常， 鼠标移动起来如丝般顺滑。但是在四百 dpi 的设置下，准心移动起来就感觉卡卡，尤其啊，是在斜向移动的时候，仿佛这个准心是被吸到了相邻的像素点上。 那我猜呢，是因为那个鼠标 dpi 太低，从而导致系统不能判断你鼠标的精确位置产生的这个像素跳跃。那为什么有些 csgo 的杰哥一直在用这个四百 dpi 呢？是不是因为他们的分辨率太低，所以就没问题？于是啊，我又把游戏那个设置调到了一二八零乘七二零，继续用四百 dpi 这个卡顿问题似乎好了一点，但是我在打假人的时候啊，感觉到这个拉枪的延迟也太大了，属于是我这种黄金分段的蔡 b 都能感觉到的延迟。而且这个低分 分辨率啊，看的我眼睛都要花了，我还是老老实实用我的高 dpi 高分辨率吧。那你的 dpi 跟分辨率分别设置是多少呢？欢迎在评论区底下留言关注水人弟弟喵，谢谢老板喵！

逻辑，鼠标 d p i 乱跳，速度经常变怎么办？粉丝疑问我们来解答。打开电脑，设置进系统里的通知，直接关掉 gop 的权限就不会弹，但这样 d p i 还是会变，纯属自欺欺人。正确的做法是打开 gap 进齿轮， 把永久性配置文件固定为桌面默认，以后不管有多少套配置，电脑都只会调用桌面默认的设置，你学会了吗？

逻辑，鼠标真垃圾，每次开机慢的跟狗一样，接哈姆唤醒后才正常。那是你不会用啊，我来教你。你他妈上次教的就不管用， 这次保准靠谱，打开即发火，把不用的 dpi 都脱掉，只保留一个右上角键设计滑板在设定为桌面默认点击启用以后鼠标开机就是你设定的 dpi。

哎，饭饭，板仔模式设置完了不好使，怎么办呢啊？没有时间忙这来兄弟坐这。首先我们打开逻辑的 jhabi 机动，点开左上角餐横杠， 然后找到有序应程序，在下边我们新建一个配置方案，三个一，然后我们点开三个一，找到我们的鼠标， 将没用的地片属实向上给他拖拽掉，然后调一下地片，调节，降低地面，提高地片，直接拖地就可以。然后找到右上角小车轮， 点一下关闭，将新配置的方案三个一选择一下，好，设置完成。注意一下右下角启动不要点，一定要给它擦掉。好，设置完成。

为什么逻辑鼠标官被驱动了，设置就变为默认？不仅 dpi 很低，改好的撤件也失效了？那是因为没有正确设置版本，打开记号，把不用的 dpi 都脱掉，只保留一个右上角进入设置，把板仔设定为桌面默认，再点击启用，最后回到 odpi 设置，增加两个更低的数字，这样既能固定 dpi， 还能保证三个灯全亮，你学会了吗？

为什么逻辑鼠标每次开机 dpi 都很低？打开驱动才正常，修改版载数据就能解决。打开金花波，选择你的鼠标，然后像小森一样删掉所有不用的 dpi， boss 机也是这样设置的，下面就只有一个， 一直会是这样是吧？对对，不会动。然后回到首页，点齿轮进入设置，点关闭，再把放入一改为桌面默认，这样你的 dpi 就存到鼠标里了，换电脑也不会动。

为什么逻辑鼠标关闭驱动设置就变回默认？不仅 dpi 很低，改好的侧键也失效了？那是因为没有正确设置版在打开机，哈勃把不用的 dpi 都脱掉，只保留一个右上角进设置滑板，在设定为桌面默认，再点击 使用，最后回到 dpi 设置，增加两个更低的数值，这样既能固定 dpi， 还能保证三个灯全亮，你学会了吗？

为什么鼠标 dpi 调低后玩游戏还是很飘？一招帮你解决，打开控制面板，打开鼠标，设置在指针选项中关闭，提高精确度。因为这个选项是给机械滚珠鼠标用的，现在的鼠标用反而会不精准。

逻辑，鼠标真垃圾，每次开机慢的跟狗一样，接哈姆唤醒后才正常。那是你不会用啊，我来教你。你他妈上次教的就不管用， 这次保准靠谱，打开即发火，把不用的 dpiphone 掉，只保留一个右上角键设计滑板在设定为桌面默认再点击启用以后鼠标开机就是你设定的 dpi。

为什么鼠标 dpi 调低后玩游戏还是很飘？一招帮你解决，打开控制面板，打开鼠标，设置在指针选项中关闭，提高精确度。因为这个选项是给机械滚珠鼠标用的，现在的鼠标用反而会不精准。

g 三零四打游戏会卡顿？快看看是不是因为开了省电模式？打开你的 ghap， 选择七三零四，在这里就能看七三零四是否是省电模式，将它调整为性能模式，这样你的鼠标回报率就会稳定在一千了。