印度试射洲际弹道导弹找到了吗

你知道全球导弹施舍最受关注的是哪个国家吗？没错，他就是印度，因为只要三哥的二铁脚一发射，全世界都要打开防控雷达， 包括三哥自己在内，随时准备迎接三哥的二铁脚，因为三哥的导弹除了起点之道，中间怎么飞的三哥自己都不知道，终点更是只有落地才能知道。 就拿三哥的波拉莫斯巡航导弹来说，在一九九五年十二月与大毛签订协议之后，仅用了两年的时间就成功组装的第一枚导弹，于是就开始迫不及待的进行施舍，这让全世界都感到震惊， 别说联合研发了，就是直接拿大毛的速度也不能这么快呀！原来是大毛把自己的导弹图纸和原材料 直接卖给了三哥，并且还派技术人员上门指导，三哥是受宠若惊，感恩戴德，所以手速也是提到的最快。按道理来说，这样组装出来的导弹应该不会有任何问题的，但是三哥总会制造惊喜。在一九九八年的首次施舍时， 印度举国欢庆，在万众瞩目的高光时刻，导弹成功爆炸并摧毁了发射台，顺便还带走了两名印度专家。而对于这样的场景， 三哥更是见怪不怪，于是接下来又连续进行了四次试射，试射结果更是震惊全世界，每一次都是发射之后就消失了，全球没有任何一个防空雷达可以监测的到，甚至有人怀疑三哥制造出了隐身导弹， 直到最后三哥才尴尬的公布，自己也找不到导弹跑哪去了，让全世界虚惊一场。但三哥 不这么想啊，心想全世界都找不到的导弹，那岂不是更厉害？于是二零一四年宣布试射成功，并命名烈火导弹开始列装。所以说，三哥的导弹才是全世界最难拦截的导弹，找都找不到，你说怎么拦截吧？

网上总说只要三哥的二踢脚一发射，全世界都要开防空雷达，因为三哥的导弹发射出去，他自己也找不到，你还真别不信，这却是事实。就在去年三月份，印度发射了一枚叫布拉莫斯超音速导弹， 最后这枚导弹射进了巴基斯坦境内，飞行了一百二十四公里，最后失控坠落。当时本来两者关系已经很紧张了，结果试射个导弹还打到人家境内。不过三哥在事后的解释时，不好意思，我们是不小心的射错了。 最后三哥自己调查的原因却是在对导弹进行维护保养的时候，直接就射出去了。我只想说，三哥你是认真的吗？不过好在巴基斯坦没有做出过激的反应，甚至还有些窃喜，因为这没导弹，没有装，战斗步 残骸相对完好，虽然是三哥的产物，但还是有点价值的。所以三哥可能真的是射错了，不然不可能不带战斗部。如果真的想射向巴基斯坦，那么三哥一定会瞄准巴基斯坦，但导弹的落点一定不会是在巴基斯坦。 这么说吧，咱们的钱学森，弹道是起点咱们知道，终点咱们知道中间怎么飞的咱们不知道。 而三哥的布朗弹道却是起点的，知道中间怎么飞的没人知道，终点是全世界都想知道。 其实印度导弹施舍失败已经是一种常态了，如果把火箭发射也算上，其失败的成功率真的是高的吓人。比较典型的是三哥的无谓是亚因素巡航导弹，总共发射了四次都失败了，如果再把现在三哥装 被的导弹算上，那就更精彩了，三哥潜艇发射导弹把自己击沉，真是狠人，连自己都不放过。其实三哥导弹在作战的时候并不可怕，因为只要你是三哥的攻击目标，你就可以大可放心。 但试射的时候就很吓人了，他要打到哪里谁也不知道，连三哥自己都不清楚，但有一点是肯定的，导弹绝不会击中目标。

let me start with professor golf first ah， why does china seem so rattle after all ah this is an indigenous development by indian scientists of the defense research and development organization a ah five thousand kilometer range ugney five missile which has multiple intended reentry vehicle ah capability why is china getting so rattled by that nowhere is india said that this technology is aimed at china thank you very much for having me i disagree with your question i think china has may process to the indian government for two things one is the deployment of about ten thousand， indian troops to the disputed areas between china and india secondly china protested against prime minister's modi to the disputed area in the eastern section of china， indian border uh which is called the south tibet by china and called as arunacho prodish by india now there is no dispute that there the border dispute does exist and china india need to handle their bothers is built carefully rather than provoking each other and china believed the deployment of ten， thousand cubes and prime minister mode is visit to our natural prodish as indian cause it and as south debate as china cause it is highly provocative that's the reason of the chinese protest you know， but the fact that this missile was tested yesterday prime minister modi went to our nachol politicians saturday and on the day that this missile is tested and india announces to the world that the missile has been tested that's when china decides to make a noise about the aeronautial british visit not on the day that it happened i don't think so i think as a sovereign country， india has all right to develop its own defense weapons of all kinds and the china has no problem with that china india need to follow a pathway of peace with each other rather their militarization against each other or provoking each other that's why china takes it very as a matter of fact the announcement of the indian villagery achievements to a certain degree i think any significant indian achievement is welcomed by china let me ask general has known there are only five other countries the p5 countries countries essentially， which have this mirv technology india now becomes the sixth and clearly if you have an intercontinental ballistic messile at five thousand kilometer range and with this mirv technology which can carry multiple nuclear warheads isn't the message to china even if it is onset see first of all zaka， i have a great respect for professor gao with the intellectual of great repute and therefore， but i have to i have to counter them in his perception here this whole aspect of missile warfare china has developed this capability for many years， last 20， 30 years they have a entire arm called the second artillery， which is dedicated essentially to missile reindeer don't have anything of that kind we were very limited missivery so far what we are attempting to essentially do is to catch up with the rest of the world in fact， it's a very good thing that among the fight among the bigger powers we have also now got the capability and this is not necessarily targeted at china we've demonstrated our capability of nations develop and test such equipment， such weaponry essentially to also a certain their own technological capability and what threshold have they been able to reach up to if china perceives are test by india as a threat to itself then this that's china's perception it not necessarily india is concerned about that they we should be perceiving similarly every time that china talks about missili， the kind of things that they do over taiwan and places like that are equally transcrust so， but we had not been protesting about that， but but general i think if i i think this technology of mir we which is a missile that's a with a range of five thousand kilometers capable of hitting beijing as they say but more importantly can cap can carry up to three to five nuclear warheads isn't that more for deterrence reasons and particularly more so because india has a no first use policy rather than for actual deployment it's not like this rocket is going to be deployed tomorrow at the lac absolutely zack absolutely and we are not going to war with china and china also knows is not going to war with us these are things which nations do for their protection these are all ac absolutely connect these are acts of deterrence which you do from time to time and china is not the only one with whom we have to you know develop that capability we have others around us we have we live in a in a neighborhood， which is a disturbed in neighborhood so i think china should not feel really disturbed about this because it has developed his own capabilities over a period of time and we have never protested about it okay， no the problem professor gow is it's not just forget about india china you know india， china's behavior towards india particularly in the last three four years that's a matter of a completely different debate altogether india looks around the region and chinese behavior around the region whether it is with japan or with south korea， or with vietnam or with philippines and and of course with taiwan what is the signal that india supposed to to derive that here is a country， which has superpower ambitions， which is trying to change the status go and sometimes even militarily push the envelope ah if if if ah， if it came down to that so the the signal and the only ah meaning that india can decipher out of this is that india has to fortify its defenses because today， it is taiwan and philippines tomorrow it could be india so india is just fortifying its defenses with the test of the agony five allow me to emphasize one thing china is a superpower in the world china is one of the five permanent member states in the security council of the united nations china is underpowered with the united states militarily and china is a larger economy than the us economy if we use verges in power parity and china is next only to the united states if we use official exchange rate china today in terms of its size of economy is more than five times that are india this is the reality however， please spare in mind china has achieved all this transformation through peace not occupying any single inch of foreign land not occupying any foreign country you talked about uh taiwan read indian governments position， indian government recognizes and acknowledges there is only one china， taiwan is part of china that's the reality don't get that wrong look at china japan relations japan unconditionally surrender to china and the united states and the former soviet union signing an experiment of unconditional surrender in that surrender japan undertook some commitments you never want to allow japan to relay their commitment sign into the instrument of the unconditional serenda otherwise you take the risk of resurrecting the shadows of imperialism in japan no， no， but professor you're missing the point the point being that there's only one country that seems to have a problem with its neighbors or at least its neighbors seem to have a problem with it i never hear of indonesia complaining about japanese high handedness or about cambodia complain or thailand complaining about south korean high handedness everybody is worried about chinese hedger money so then who is the problem with i disagree allow me to tell you one symbol too china has 14 land neighboring countries china signed border treating with 12 of them including vietham china has a border treaty agreement with vietnam only two countries have not signed border treaty with china india， your great india and putan which is controlled by india in terms of diplomacy and military okay china has signed border treaty with among all the others russia， do you hear any problem between china russia which share border of four thousand and three hundred kilometers in the recent past historically you know the soviet union and china never saw i to i would be that as a mate that that's that's not the point of to tonight's debate， but。