粉丝182获赞5411
uh, now, we're we're hanged with a situation where china's gonna be probably have an economy two to three times the size of the united states and so that that's just a different um different world um, i do think there's you know there's there are a lot of people in the government china who kind of grew up with china not being with china being a small economy and maybe who feel like china was pushed around a lot and but they but they haven't fully appreciated the fact that that china really is gonna be the big kid on the block and and so like if you're gonna be the big kid on the block then you you you could really be pretty chill about things you know you don't have to worry about like other countries are not really a threat to you if you're by far the biggest kid on the block and you know so i would say it's that that's kind of an important mindset change hopefully that that that you know trying to go through is just you know to think like if you're all the biggest kid like how would you want the biggest kid on the block to behave and now if you are ever gonna be the biggest kid on the block then wouldn't you want to behave like you'd want like you would have wanted the biggest kid on the blocks behave i think that's that's pretty important。
which seems crazy because a lot of people in china, but the china has overbuilt primary housing units and people expect later on primary housing units just like the us did and lead up to two thousand eight, so in the us lead up to two thousand eight, the us was building primary housing units at twice, the rate of hassled formation, so if you're making houses twice as fast as as families are forming then obviously something got to give we were doing that in the us for a while and so china's been doing that as well, but even more, so that'll be a that's a correction that's gonna happen, but ultimately the chinese company will be gigantic and is gigantic, and we'll recover from this。 喜欢就关注我吧,看 c 位大佬解读 c 位大事。
what we're gonna see uh which was china for uh for the first time that anyone can remember who is alive is an economy that is twice the size of the us possibly three times the size of the u s so we better stop the in fighting in the us and stop punching ourselves in the face there's like there's a whole there's way too much of america punching itself in the damn face it's just just dumb。
对比中美,马斯克称中国经济规模将达美国两三倍,即促美停止内讧。据美国福克斯新闻网十七日报道, 特斯拉 cu 埃隆马斯克当地时间十六日晚在接受全方位欧印波克主持人采访时表示,世界第二大经济体中国有朝一日将让美国的产值箱形建筑。为了与中国竞争,美国必须停止内讧。 我们将看到的是,中国的经济规模是美国的两倍,也可能是美国的三倍。到那时候,任何活着的人都将第一次见证这一时刻,生活在那样的世界里会很奇怪。马斯克谈到美中经济时这样说道。 为此,马斯克警告美国最好停止内讧,停止打自己的脸。他说,美国打自己脸的方法 太多了,这太愚蠢了。想想看,非我们自己必须要有竞争力。马斯克形容,这就像街区里有一个新来的孩子,将是我们个头的两到三倍大。他再次敦促我们最好加紧行动,停止内讧。 福克斯在报道中称,根据美国经济分析局逼的数据,美国二零二一年的 gdp 总量约为二十三万亿美元。 中国国家统计局的数据显示,中国二零二一年的 gdp 总量达一百一十四点四万亿元人民币,按年平均汇率折算约十七点七万亿美元。这不是马斯克第一次将中美两国作对比。 据英国独立报五月十日报道,马斯克在接受金融时报的在线采访时称赞中国工人。报道称,当 被问及目前有哪家电动汽车初创公司给他留下了最深刻的印象时,马斯克并没有提到其美国市场的竞争对手,美国新能源汽车初创企业 lucid motors 和美国电动汽车制造商 riben 而是称赞其中国。 马斯克说,中国有很多超级有才华而又勤奋的人,他们对制造业的信念非常强大。他还说,他们中国工人不仅会工作到深夜,他们会工作到凌晨三点,他们甚至不会离开工厂。 而在美国,人们却尽量不去上班。马斯克这是在忽悠中国吧,怕中国真超过美国。马斯克深安中国之道,学会了捧杀。中国人不是机器也需要休息的, 只是勤劳了点,节俭了点,勇敢了点,智慧了点而已。只能说明马斯克很聪明,知道谁爱听什么话,在哪里能说什么话。美帝靠战争发财,中国人靠勤劳致富。
马斯克说,中国的 gdp 至少是美国的两倍,这番言论究竟有无根据?让我们一同深入分析,探索其中的真相。在中国, gdp 的计算采用生产法,这种方法着重于经济活动中创造的新增价值,即通过从总产出中剔除中间投入的价值 来衡量新增的经济贡献。这一计算方式意味着中国的 gdp 统计有效排除了生产过程中可能出现的重复计算问题,从而更精确的反映了各个产业部门在最终产品和服务上创造的新财富。这是什么意思呢?我们来举个简单的例子, 假设有一个制造面包的过程,这个过程涉及到多个步骤,首先是农场生产小麦,小麦被卖给面粉厂,面粉厂将其加工成面粉。最后面粉被面包厂购买用来制作面包。 如果我们单纯把每个步骤的产值加起来,也就是农场的小麦、面粉厂的面粉和面包厂的面包就会重复计算一些价值。比如面包的价格其实已经包含了小麦和面粉的价值。在生产法计算 gdp 时, 我们不是简单的加总所有这些产值,相反,我们只计算每个阶段新增的价值。例如,面粉厂创造的价值就是面粉的价格减去购买小麦的成本,这样计算出来的 gdp 更能准确反映经济中创造的新财富, 避免了重复计算。所以中国采用这种方法来确保其 gdp 数据能精确反映经济活动中真正新增的价值。而美国采用支出法来计算 gdp, 这包括了国内所有最终商品和服务的总支出,如居民消费、企业投资和政府开支以及进出口差额。这种 方法虽然将进口商品和服务也计入国内产出,但他更多反映了美国经济的多元化和实体经济活动的动力,包括内部市场消费、高科技创新和国际资本流动。我们来举个简单的例子,美国一个家庭在一个月内进行了以下活动, 他们买了一台在美国生产的电视和一些进口的衣服。这些消费支出都被计算在美国的 gdp 中。 一个本土公司决定扩大规模,建造了一个新的生产设施,这笔投资也是 gdp 的一部分。政府在一个月内修建了一条新公路,这项公共支出同样计入 gdp。 假设美国进口的商品价值大于其出口的商品价值, 这个贸易逆差也会在 gdp 的计算中体现。马斯克提出的见解意味着中国在全球经济中的真实贡献有可能被低估。 当我们深入考虑到附加值的完整链条,中国在全球供应链中扮演的角色暗示其对世界经济的实际影响可能远超目前 gdp 所反应的水平。与此同时,美国的 gdp 计算方式 通过更全面的支出指标展现了美国极其公民对全球商品和服务的需求与消费。然而,这并不意味着美国的经济增长只依赖于货币发行和购买国外商品。实际上,这一数据更多反映了美国的整体经济活动和多元化的经济结构。
你可能无法相信,马斯克在与美国太空部队的汤普森将军的一次会议中竟然说出了大实话。当汤普森将军对马斯克提出关于中美之间经济和军事竞争的问题时,现场众多士官和记者都非常期待马斯克的回答。 马斯克沉思良久后的回答出人意料,以下是他的原话,我觉得中国是一个极富魅力的国家,那里有众多聪明且勤奋的人民,他们定会创造许多伟大成就。而且中国的人口大约是美国的四到五倍,因此, 只要他们的人均 gdp 达到美国的一半,中国的经济总量就能达到美国的两倍。并且经济是战争的基石。如果你只拥有对方一半的资源,那么成为真正的创新者就尤为重要。如果不去创新,就只能面临失败。马斯克 刚发言完,汤普森将军随后的发言也是提醒马斯克要好好说话,随后马斯克感觉很无奈。随后马斯克继续说道,为了在军事上保持竞争力,我们必须通过创新来弥补经济产出上的巨大差异。 如果缺乏基础性的创新,美国在军事领域会落后于他国区居第二。马斯克对创新的重要性赋予了极高的价值, 他进一步指出,如果没有创新,那么完成某项任务可能需要花费数十年甚至上百年的时间。马斯克的这些观点你们认同吗?欢迎在评论区留言。
马斯克近日在社交平台 x 上评论中美电力生产能力,说中国工业产能已远远超过美国。根据二零二四年版世界能源统计年间数据显示,两千年之后,中国发电量就呈直线上升趋势,到二零一零年左右就赶超美国。 到二零二三年,中国的发电量已达到九点四万亿千瓦时,而美国为四点四万亿千瓦时,中国的发电量几乎是美国的两倍多。马斯克也认为,工业产能首先近似于发电量,从这一角度来看,中国的工业产能确实具有明显优势。
the united states has been the wall slash just economy for as long as anyone can remember and there's nobody that old really anymore who can remember a time when the united states just thought the wall speakest economy now, we're we hang towards the situation where china is gonna be probably have an economy two to three times the size of the united states, and so that's just a different different world i think that's you know there are a lot of people in the government china who kind of grew up with china not being it was trying to being a small economy and maybe you feel like china was pushed around a lot i haven't fully appreciated the fact that that china really is gonna be the big hit on the bottom and and so like if you're gonna be the big hit on the a lot then you can really be pretty chill about things you know you don't have to worry about like other countries are not really a threat to you if you're by far the biggest kid on the block yeah we are headed to to an interesting in different world you know world human beings as let's just try to have as as positive um our relationship was possible and you know and and work towards neutral prosperity of humanity as a whole。