粉丝5322获赞3.1万
各位兄弟大家好,我是小狗,欢迎大家来到。 check yourself go real love less now did you love me or my cash my name pain drop top into the wind dash you know my stash with jar g cash platinum u s expression no left when it crashed are you to type the brag when type that love no scrubs her pigeons and got mad type that can't stand a woman with her own cash you know like lime we claim she ain't rat type to get out and public refrain too busy for y'all plenty of domes turn me on then turn me off try show off get lost grow up real women grow up let yourself go if you feel this let me know come on。
嗨,铁子们,我是老马。嗯,今天是一个悲伤的视频,因为昨天呢,有一个朋友在抖音上给我发私信, 跟我说,他按照我视频里的方法捏欧文的剑魔的时候,最后捏出的类似球员里却没有欧文的名字。后来我自己打开电脑打算自己试一下的时候,发现二 k 更新了一个补丁,我当时就预感这个事情可能和这个补丁就有关系。 现在大家看到的是我欧文建模的那个视频素材,原始视频啊,我的三个类似球员分别是欧文、加蓝和麦克勒姆,而现在我按照这个方法捏出来人物分别是加蓝、麦克勒姆和库里, 欧文的名字直接删除掉了。这时候我意识到可能类似球员的整个名单都会有一些 调整,那既然类似学院里已经没有欧文了,所以我先把我以前的那个视频删掉了。接下来我开始对我之前发过的所有的作品进行了一个筛查,想看看还有没有类似的情况。一查之下还真有。 比如说之前我发的杜兰特的剑魔,现在杜兰特的名字排到了第二位啊,第一位变成了英格拉姆。 呃,还有卡特的剑魔,也是,现在第一位变成了爱德华姿,但都不如欧文剑魔这么直接啊,直接把欧文整没了。所以视频呢,我就没有做处理,最后就着这个版本改动和大家聊两句吧。 其实很多朋友见模板的时候,都只是在乎他好不好玩,不会去在乎类似球员是谁,但是我的视频还有人看,这说明还是有一部分吧, 玩家会因为种种原因很看重类似球员这个属性,所以我就想说游戏公司在做类似调整的时候能不能不要这么粗暴,至少也得让我们玩家能够保留以前我们捏出来的东西吧。 对我本人而言,说实话,每一个建模都是我经过无数次的实验,长时间的打磨才能最终定稿的,我也为此投入了非常多的精力和时间。现在呢,我看着我的心血啊,被版本无情抛弃,我说实话,我 会觉得有一点沮丧,不过也没关系,只要不是只删了本时代的就可以。次是不会真是吧?关键我这没有主机啊,我也没有次时代可以看。 呃,如果看到这个视频呢?有次世代玩家能不能麻烦你帮我做个实验,按照我视频最前面的那个建模方法,去次世代版本试一下,看看能不能捏出欧文。 如果真是只删本时代的话,我真的容易当场骂街。好吧,那今天就先聊到这了,咱们下回再见。拜拜。
what is going on guys? welcome back to the channel for this quick video and there will be the fifth video of my best layer package series and i'll be covering kyrie irving layer package thank you guys for all the support in this series your comments and likes keep this series going, so after watching, please let me know in the comment section any feedback or any recommendation on which package should i cover next so if you know the mechanics of these tests you can just jump to the numbers parts straightaway, but if not you can just continue watching the video, so you can know how these test works so basically what's going to happen is i will test each packages on different setups i got normal reverse euros and hop step layups for the players the specific setup is not that important, but i'll still make it realistic anyway, the important thing here is that all packages should be tested under the same setup, i'm talking about the same player setup like the badges and stats, same controls and positioning and for the positioning i calibrated a good setup so it's not too open, it's not too crowded so i can really see variations on different packages and to make it more accurate as much as possible, i'll try to make each samples the same i'm talking about the same position on offense and defense of course it's hard to make it harder present exactly the same so i'll be taking a lot of attempts on each test so in that way, the margin of error can be reduced, so not for the results first one on euro layops surprisingly it's right at the top, so far that's really a good start but on the next part though which is for reverse layops it's right there at the fort place by the way, i'm not judging all these packages overall i know there's a lot of elements of these packages that can't be put into numbers like there's some stuff that are not included in here like the visual misdirection and some other stuff, i'm only judging each packages based on the actual setup that i'm testing now for the next one this one here is kind of decent it's between zac, levine and long athlete, which are highly praised packages so that's a good sign now pressing the same controls on the same position doesn't guarantee the same animations all the time on each packages so that randomness there is already factored in on those results now for the next one in terms of hop layups, it's right there at the first place, again and for those who are wondering why i'm testing for challenge reduction it's because i believe the better challenge reduction the better make personage so now for the summary kyri, irving package is on the top so far in terms of hop and newer layups, and it is kind of decent on normal layups and reverse layups so again, please let me know in the comments section and a recommendation on which。